Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2229d56ee84f54b

Jump to content

Talk:Moggmentum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ElectronicsForDogs in topic Johnson government, Covid, Election loss, Aftermath

No consensus

[edit]

Hi, User:AusLondonder! I understand the AfD was closed as 'no consensus', which does not mean redirect. Am I not in the right?Zigzig20s (talk) 01:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:AusLondonder: Yes, I read your edit summary, and the AfD was not "Delete" or "Redirect", it was "No consensus". So please restore this article, and nominate it for a second AfD.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply and for starting this discussion. Did you read the closing summary of the AfD? The closer stated "In any case, discussion has died down, and merging the content does not require AfD." It is already covered in overzealous detail at Jacob Rees-Mogg#Rumoured run for leadership. Does that not suffice? AusLondonder (talk) 03:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
User:AusLondonder: The closer was yourself! Sorry, this looks like you are trying to delete the article. Please restore it and start a second AfD. That is how it works. You need to reach consensus to delete content. Or, restore it and propose a merge and wait for consensus.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, the closer was not me please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moggmentum. AusLondonder (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough (it's a little late here). But the closer says, "No consensus to keep the article or merge the content to another.". There is no consensus to merge, and I object to the merge without further discussion. Please restore the content and start another AfD or start a merge proposal.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Possibly useful source

[edit]

Today's Observer has an article Jacob Rees-Mogg: on the trail of the pinstripe pretender which may be a useful source for this article. Rod talk 10:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

What is totally missing from this article, is what it means to be part of moggmentum

[edit]

Based on the this man's voting record, it goes without saying, the people behind Moggmentum are aligned with his values. His values are not the record of a person with an open mind and beautiful soul.

 Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.166.248 (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Voting record collapsed due to its size by Seagull123 Φ 22:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Johnson government, Covid, Election loss, Aftermath

[edit]

Mogg lost his seat at the 2024 election.

However it's unclear if he, or these groups of activists, hope a return to politics could occur one day.

Additionally, there's no coverage of his ministerial positions in the early 2020s. How did Moggmentum advocates react to his time in the news?

Food for thought. ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 13:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply