Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2254a3befbc2407

Jump to content

Talk:Modular curve

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Charles Matthews in topic Monstrous moonshine

To do:

  1. most importantly, a picture of modular figure (for the modular group itself);
  2. algebraic definition of modular curves (Nick Katz's approach);
  3. towers of modular curves, adelic interpretation, Hecke correspondences;
  4. examples of modular curves mod p, short description of Eichler-Shimura;
  5. other applications, e.g. Drinfeld-Vladuts, Ramanujan graphs.

Feel free to contribute to any of these! Arcfrk 02:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Better to put the group (Gamma) on the left, thus Gamma\H in place of H\Gamma etc. globally.

[John McKay]24.200.80.81 09:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Monstrous moonshine

[edit]

I feel that this section is out of place here, even aside from its inferior quality. It should be enough just to mention that modular curves of genus 0 are connected with the Monster finite simple group and refer to the reasonably well-written article on the moonshine conjectures for details. Arcfrk (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't see a serious problem: the order of material should probably be switched around, though. Hauptmodul, as the German terminology suggests, goes back to the Klein-Fricke era, and is quite classical therefore. Perhaps some comments first on how the genus of a modular curve is calculated, and then the genus 0 case (happens only finitely often); and then some mention of the interest from the finite group side. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply