Talk:Mocha Uson Blog
Add topicLatest comment: 4 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vandalism
[edit]This wiki page is more focused on compiling negative opinions about the subject instead of giving useful info. It must be removed or rewritten in a fairer and more neutral tone. The referenced articles are from Rappler and Rappler journalists are personally in dispute with Mocha Uson. NoNDeSCRiPT (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- It isn't vandalism. It is fact that there were critics of the blog and it is indeed useful what critics of the blog and Mocha Uson did against the Facebook Page. The petition page to remove the Mocha Uson Blog is noteworthy as well as the counter-petition by supporters against the blog's critics. The fact about a satirical blog "Mochang Tanga Blog" shouldn't be removed with the reasoning that "tanga" is an inappropriate word (remember WP:NOTCENSORED). It won't make the page "neutral" by removing information about criticisms of the blog.
- Though I agree that the section is too inclined to critics as
its stand nowbefore you removed the so-called "vandalism" but it shouldn't be erased. Opinions about key people in the admin would be helpful/ views of the supporters (with sources) would be beneficial.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2018 (UTC)- To add, opinions either negative, neutral or positive to the blog should be credited. I phrased the section to make sure that the statement came from Rappler. It is up to the reader if they will believe if Rappler is credible or biased for example hence the use of "said" instead of saying straight up state "Mocha Uson peddles lies to the general public".Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
