Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2510ff59851c60e

Jump to content

Talk:Mirrodin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Set history

[edit]

After reading this section I unpacked my Mirrodin cards. I don't see any difference between the artifacts from Mirrodin and 5th Dawn. Could this have been limited to a specific area, or one particular batch of cards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.242.145 (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The difference is there, although in the Fifth Dawn article, it mentions that Mirrodin cards were reprinted with the Fifth Dawn borders in the theme decks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neonkow (talkcontribs) 00:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article should mention the significant banning of the Skullclamp card while the set was still new. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.113.0 (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mirrodin Pure?

[edit]

Is it notable to reference the Mirrodin Pure trademark? Or should we wait until there is more info? 24.19.97.37 (talk) 18:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Magic categories to be merged back to block structure discussion

[edit]

A nomination can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 16#Category:Magic: The Gathering blocks to merge Magic categories back to blocks from sets. Feel free to join in on the discussion. Leitmotiv (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply