Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a289183d895452f1

Jump to content

Talk:Ministry of propaganda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by 67.161.33.200 in topic September 2006

September 2006

[edit]

I don't think this article should exist. It is not clear enough to me that there is such a thing as a "ministry of propaganda" in a general sense. The historical government entities that can be described as such don't amount to a thing in general, like a legislature or whatever - they have been too different. It's a made-up concept without a literature to back it up. Articles about specific gov't agencies that have done this are sufficient.Rlitwin 15:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The other reason I'm against this is the terminology. Not all governments call their agencies "ministries." In the US they are called "agencies." So, why Ministry of Propaganda? Rlitwin 15:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

To get a soapbox for the Roberts quote? Weregerbil 15:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article should exist. Ministries of propaganda did exist, as in Nazi Germany. They haven't been around post-WW2, just as the article states. It is not a made-up concept, in other words.

I think I shall change the article slightly, however. It asserts that governments have a right to distribute information, which, while not a very objectionable "right", is rather disturbing because it assumes the premise that a government can have rights at all. This is generally not held to be true, so I'd ask that it not be put back in the article without a supporting reference. 67.161.33.200 (talk) 16:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply