Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22f5e5daaa8ceb4

Jump to content

Talk:Minimal coupling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this true? I think one gets higher multipole moments from the minimal coupling principle. Because one does a dipole-approximation to get the "E times r" or "A times p" hamiltonian out of the minimal-coupling hamiltonian. I understood that minimal accounts for the most simple introduction of the interaction which yields an gauge invariant hamiltonian. --31.18.25.138 (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality issue

[edit]

This article does not treat quantum mechanics and field theory. It should be rewritten or deleted. Aoosten (talk) 12:06, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, minimal coupling is not necessarily a quantum concept. You can add more if you want.--ReyHahn (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Total energy" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Total energy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 20 § Total energy until a consensus is reached. Myceteae🍄‍🟫(talk) 21:02, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply