Talk:Military strike
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Rich Farmbrough in topic This article reads like an academic paper
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article reads like an academic paper
[edit]This article reads like an academic paper, but I am not sure how this issue could be fixed. The main problem might be excessive in-text citations to other sources, including parenthetical references. A better article would streamline the references and create a more coherent overview of the topic. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:443C:9603:3623:E956 (talk) 18:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- I removed some of the long paraphrasing sections as a start. The article will need to be expanded with more encyclopedic content though from diverse sources. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:443C:9603:3623:E956 (talk) 18:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
These edits remove significant content. I'm not sure I agree with your rationale. Certainly there could be more discussion of strikes, maybe a list. But the removed content seems valuable to me. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC).