Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25c060dbfe9376a

Jump to content

Talk:Mike Whitehead

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Echosmoke in topic Rape conviction coverup

Rape conviction.

[edit]

Mike Whitehead is a convicted rapist and sex offender. I recall this entry accurately portrayed that but it seems over the years it fell off. I don't see any edit history pertaining to it though. ~2025-32046-79 (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it was removed by an IP, then was restored and re-removed by @2NumForIce in November 2023 for treating as AGF removal (contained few info) which I'm admittedly having some trouble parsing. From a very cursory glance at the content, it strikes me as probably acceptable to restore, though I'd ideally like 2NumForIce's input first even though they did those edits 2 years ago now (and don't appear terribly active anymore). I'm not well versed on the reliability of sources regarding athletes.
I'd say give it a couple days before grabbing that personal life section from the history here. LaffyTaffer💬(she/they) 06:00, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Paying for edits

[edit]

Mr. Whitehead is bragging on social media about paying a reputation company to cover up his sexual assault. You can see it here on his edits. ~2025-32046-79 (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rape conviction coverup

[edit]

Can anything be done about someone constantly trying to cover up Mike Whiteheads rape conviction in his Wikipedia entry? ~2025-32046-79 (talk) 07:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sent a request for Semi-edit or edit protection on the Admin board. --KoRoBeNiKi Medical Coder, chess specialist, retired SSBWiki rollback, hi? 07:41, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have reviewed the previous edits, and managed to pull out archived reports of the case. The pertinent details of the case are back in the article. We don't need to go into too much detail about the case. Also, there is no recent disruptive edits, so that the request to increase protection levels is declined. However, on the social media bragging @~2025-32046-79, can you point us to a source? – robertsky (talk) 11:30, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
It would appear there were no disruptive edits because the company paid for them achieved their goal. How long are we going to watch the ongoing edit war? --Echosmoke (talk) 10:03, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply