Talk:Mike Procter

WP:BLP

...is being violated with these potentially libellious comments that are going uncited. I have run through the controversies section citing everything that needs to be addressed, mainly references and attribution, "many have said" sounds like WP:OR and the authors own opinion to me. SGGH ^speak! 09:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I stripped it back to what is actually in the citation. The previous revision is this one if anyone wants to find sources for the statements I removed. --Cherry blossom tree 11:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

greatest all-rounders

My impression is that very often there are comparisons of the greatest all rounders - especially those of the Hadlee/Imran Khan/Kapil Dev/Clive Rice era and that usually Mike Procter is not included. Why would this be ? He may be slightly earlier but not enough to make a comparison impossible. He was only born 3 years earlier than the late, great Clive Rice and his career overlapped with some of those other great all-rounders. Many thanks for views — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.163.59 (talk) 19:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Proctershire ??

Not sure if that was the appropriate subheading J mareeswaran (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Poor article

Sad to hear that this great cricketer has died. I cannot use Twinkle on tablet away from homebase but I would like to tag the article for necessary cleanup as it is poor quality and needs some serious copy editing. Batagur baska (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)