Talk:Miho

Split (2023)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to split. History6042 (talk) 19:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

---

This article is more than a simple name list, it contains substantive material about the Japanese name, but also a namelist for the Croatian name. This would be conflating two different topics, a Japanese female name and a Croatian male name. They should be treated in separate articles. "Miho" would become a disambiguation page, converting part of the see-also section in the disambiguation content, along with some remaining in see-also, and the two new name articles as disambiguation content. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, seems clear that the Japanese name is the primary topic at least for now. I think the Croatian name should be split to its own article with a hatnote on this one and this makes it clearer that it's the Japanese name. Canterbury Tail talk 22:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

• I would support a split.★Trekker (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
• Support. It currently talks about two different subjects ("Miho" as a name of Japanese origin, and "Miho" as a name of Croatian origin), and even when their transliteration is the same, they seem to have originated independently and separatedly. --Onwa (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
• Support. I like the cut of your jib. —holly {chat} 17:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mihou

Should the article mention somewhere that Miho Nonaka's given name is read as みほう? It's unusual, and possibly the only one in the list (I didn't check all of them), but it contradicts the readings in the top section and "Possible Japanese writings". W8D8 (talk) 17:16, 19 May 2026 (UTC)