Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Is a genealogical chart really appropriate in this article? This seems more in line with discussion on Descendants of Miguel I of Portugal, or individual descendents. Shouldn't this article be used to describe the Miguelista faction through the post Liberal Wars, and into the overthrow of the monarchy? In the period between these events, the use of the term was more common and prevalent. I believe that the article on the people might necessitate the chart, but on this subject, it seems more like an attempt to justify the legitimacy of the family branch (i.e. WP:NPOV)? Can I get some input from other editors? ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
