Talk:Microdispensing
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.liquidyn.com. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2008071610020699. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I, (Peter Langer), am the author of this article, (microdispensing), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later.
Only for use on wikipedia!
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdispensing"
- Unfortunately, when you release text under the GNU Free Documentation License, it is not limited for use to Wikipedia. It can be used by anyone as long as they also release it under the same license. You have to take that bit out from the page at http://www.liquidyn.com/dosiertechnik0.html. ... discospinster talk 15:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
status
[edit]As usual, a manufacturer web page is not really suitable for an encyclopedia article. I cleaned it up a little, removed a line of pure advertising, adjusting the bias towards the form of dispensing the company sells, simplifying the sentence structure, and removing many unnecessary words. I would have continued, but I realized a major problem: the overwhelming amount of the text is about dispensing liquids and semi-solids in general, not about microdispensing. There is in fact essentially no material about the actual subject. Maybe the material here can be used elsewhere, after cleaning it, and a proper article written. And in any case it needs references other than the web site. It needs references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. A textbook would be a good choice here. I'll be back to see progress . DGG (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I came here to fix a mis-spelling and ended up with a good example of how to eat up more time than I have :-| It still needs a lot of work and review by someone more familiar with the subject (than I am). Then there's the problem with it being generally about fluid through nozzles instead of microdispensing... AlanM1 (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)