Talk:Microceratus
Add topicLatest comment: 9 months ago by Crylophosaurus in topic Microceratus is dubious?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxonomy of Microceratops
[edit]Microceratops Bohlin, 1953 is pre-occupied by the hymenopteran genus Microceratops Seyrin, 1952, making the dinosaur's name invalid. The replacement name for Microceratops will probably be Miniceratops. Thus, place Microceratops in quotes to note that it is pre-occupied. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.116.63 (talk • contribs)
What is the type specimen?
[edit]there must be a type specimen....... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.118.227.28 (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Microceratus is dubious?
[edit]This is mentioned in the beginning of the article, but the article makes no mention of why it's dubious, which should probably be added. Can someone explain to me why it's dubious (if it is)? Crylophosaurus (talk) 18:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)