Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22bb34a1c9e122e

Jump to content

Talk:Microbiome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMicrobiome has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 5, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that non-microscopic life forms such as plants associate with microbiomes of microscopic organisms which determine their health and productivity?

Introduction doesn't mention any limited environments

[edit]

As a non-biologist I found the introduction to this article obscure. Like I'll guess most readers I came to the article wanting to find information about the human biome and found only information about a "habitat" and one thing the Wiki article for habitat doesn't enlarge on is the bodies of plants or animals. I found the simpler statement in the Microbiome Journal - "studies of microbiomes colonizing humans, animals, plants or the environment" much easier to comprehend.

Indeed the first mention of "body" is not until the second paragraph of the Definitions paragraph.

Thinking about it, I realise that subconsciously I was making an association between "micro" and "micro-environment" which does not exist. It's right that the article doesn't give the impression that a microbiome only exists in limited areas. However all Wikipedia articles should be accessible to the average reader, particularly the introduction, and many people will be unaware of the rich colonies of microbiota in different parts of the body. They may not read further than the introduction and will therefore be none the wiser.

Could I request the recasting of the introduction to make it clear that the microbiomes of the bodies of animals and plants can be very different to their surroundings. Chris55 (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Historical context of Bechamp in microbiome article

[edit]

Historical context of Béchamp in microbiome article

[edit]

The paragraph on Antoine Béchamp documents a historically notable 19th-century theory of pleomorphism. Although Béchamp's ideas were ultimately rejected by mainstream biology, they are well-sourced and relevant for understanding historical debates on microbial variability.

Inclusion is consistent with WP:FRINGE and WP:NPOV guidelines: fringe or obsolete scientific theories may be mentioned if they are notable, sourced, and clearly presented as historical context. The section clearly states that Béchamp's model is not part of modern biology, distinguishing historical theory from contemporary microbiome research. Reliable sourcing includes the original work (Béchamp 1912/2020) and secondary scholarly analyses of historical microbiology.

This inclusion does not endorse Béchamp's theory but provides readers with factual context about alternative microbial concepts that preceded germ theory, which shaped the intellectual environment from which modern microbiome science emerged. Moonmaskart (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply