Talk:Micralign
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by 97198 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Micralign appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 01:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
( )
- ... that an industry observer noted that Perkin-Elmer's Micralign aligner "literally made the modern IC industry"? Source: as cited from chip history web page
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 20:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC).
- I just started reviewing the article, but I have a suggestion already. The hook should probably add the fact that it was only stated. One source stating that it literally made the modern IC industry doesn't necessarily make it so. SL93 (talk) 11:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Much of what appears in the lead, such as what it says about the number of units sold, Wall Street, and Micrascan doesn't appear elsewhere in the article which is fine - but it needs to be referenced. SL93 (talk) 11:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
for now. SL93 (talk) 11:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry didn't get the ping. All fixed? Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes. Good to go. SL93 (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- I tried to link the QPQ, but there's no such page. Could you link it to the correct page please? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I can't it seems - the article was there when I linked it, but now it seems to be gone. When I use History on this noms page, I always get today's version even though it says otherwise at the top. For instance, I selected the version from 5 August and I could still see your comment posted today. Maury Markowitz (talk)
- OMG, an autocorrect issue. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
