Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2347a437ed15aae

Jump to content

Talk:Michelle Mone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by 1isall in topic Requested move 9 January 2026

ppe

[edit]

Please expand the use of the term ppe to personal protective equipment and maybe hyperlink. Thanks 211.27.66.50 (talk) 03:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2025

[edit]

I have been reviewing the details if Baroness Michelle Georgina Mone and because it is a protected site I was not allowed to make the necessary changes.

The changes are to be made to her marriage to Michael John Mone which wikipedia has as 1989. This is not correct. Her marriage to Michael John Mone was in 1992 which was done to hide from public view that she gave birth in the same year and give her some legitimacy.

The information is corroborated by the website wwww.scotlandspeople.gov.uk in the marriages section and in the divorces page "Year Of Marriage" section.

BIRTHS Www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/record-results/1336567623690bbaa786134 DIVORCES www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/record-results/1061090248690bbb3302a2a

The divorce was in the Court of Session, serial number 5855, Divorce Year 2013; Marriage 1992.

Hence, it is right that you amend this record.

Many thanks ~2025-31308-66 (talk) 21:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

These are primary sources and our policy about using them in biographies prohibits using them like this. We need to wait for a secondary source to take notice of it first (if they ever do). SmartSE (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2026

[edit]

Change Spouse: Michael Mone (m1989 - 2011) to Michael Mone (m1992 - 2011)

As provided by Scotland's People website page:

https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/record-results/1148636393696127a338abc

This is the details for Registrars of Scotland Births, Marriages, Deaths and Divorces. Ka1mhill (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Ka1mhill: Thanks for raising this. We didn't previously have any source for either date. I have now added a source confirming the divorce occurred in 2011, but the source you cite (not that that link actually works for anyone) is a primary source, which is explicitly not able to be used in biographies. This is potentially suitable as a source to cite for the marriage being in 1992 however and this also says they were married for 19 years which tallies with 1992 being correct. SmartSE (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Date of Marriage

[edit]

Michelle Mone was not married in 1989 but 1992 which is to make her legit. As it turns out, she is not white than snow, especially when her eldest Rebecca was born in 1989. To legitimize her pregnancy she states her marriage was 1989 instead of being 3 years later, 1992. Ka1mhill (talk) 16:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 9 January 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 19:21, 16 January 2026 (UTC)Reply


Michelle Mone, Baroness MoneMichelle Mone – Almost all substantial coverage of the subject simply uses just their unique base name to describe them, while the honorary peerage title by contrast finds little meaningful usage. See Ngrams and the entire reference section on page. In the context, the honorific disambiguator is neither required, per WP:NCBRITPEER, not desirable, for obvious concision reasons. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.