Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michelle Alexander article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Attempts to add this topic have failed, due to lacking a WP:NPOV and unbiased sources. However misguided one may think her writings to be (including about MLK's so-called Zionism), the topic can only be added as mere reportage, in a neutral, balanced, manner. I read Alan Dershowitz's The Hill article last week, lambasting her increasingly infamous NYT piece, but the polarization around the topic yielded a mere she said, he said, so wasn't suitable as a stand-alone source without drifting into WP:ORIG. It's complex, and there probably should be something written in about the controversy, but with an authoritative NPOV. Lindenfall (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
71.245.242.138"in several publications of significance to the Jewish community." expresses a lack of a NPOV. Please find more neutral sources. The item is worth adding, but not in a biased way. At this point, bring it to TALK first. Lindenfall (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have protected the page, not to favor one version or another, but to allow editors to discuss content, tone, weight, and sourcing here on the talk page. The content should not be added back without a consensus to do so. If talk page discussion does not lead to consensus, do please request an RfC and post notices on the relevant Wikiprojects to gain as much discussion as possible. Failing that, there can be discussion at WP:BLPN and users can follow that with dispute resolution. Please remember that BLPs require the highest quality sourcing for the addition of controversial or negative content. Cheers, and happy editing.Dlohcierekimtalk22:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
