Talk:Michael the Syrian/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Hogshine (talk · contribs) 11:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Reverosie (talk · contribs) 19:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I will be your GA reviewer. Comments will begin over the weekend! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 19:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Reverosie, I hope all is well. Just checking if we're still on this? No problem if not. Hogshine (talk) 09:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Yes, I am still working on this review. I'm so sorry it has taken so long! The spot check is going smoothly and should be done today or tomorrow :) ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 22:21, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Please take as much time as you need. I just thought I did something wrong, this is my first GA submission Thanks Hogshine (talk) 12:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

The spot check is now complete! It looks good. Allow me to post my procedure for the review below ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:30, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Procedure

My procedure will go like this: I will go in and copyedit the article myself. Instead of pointing out small gripes that I could easily fix without nagging you, my suggestions will focus on larger issues where your input and expertise are needed. If I do not have any of these suggestions, the article will be quick passed. If I do have suggestions, I will pass the article when they are dealt with accordingly.

You will have as much time as you need to fix my suggestions (if I have any), but if you go multiple weeks without making any progress (and do not give me a reason as to why), I may have to fail you. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 20:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm more than happy to fix whatever issues you may come across, big and small, within 1-3 days. I've combed through this article word by word for days looking for errors and I'd love any chance to improve it, so do let me know; it won't be naggy. Your efforts are much appreciated! Hogshine (talk) 08:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

For the most part, this article is ready for GA status. However, the article's lead is too short, and needs to encompass every part of the article. A paragraph about Michael's life and patriarchate must be added to the lead. ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 23:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

How does it look now, and does it need anything else? Thanks. Hogshine (talk) 07:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

You certainly weren't lying when you said you spent days combing through each word of this article. I've found nothing I feel as though I need to change. This article is absolutely ready for GA status, and it will be the 100th crusades-related GA!

I'd like to commend you on your work here and encourage you to keep contributing to Wikipedia, for you've certainly made a positive impact here :) (May I also suggest nominating this article for FA status in the future?)

Congratulations! ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 16:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.