Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a457198d988b7f3b

Jump to content

Talk:Michael Yeadon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 24 days ago by Hob Gadling in topic Fact checkers


Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2025

[edit]

Michael Yeadon’s early condemnation of covid and covid vaccines has proven to be largely correct in hindsight. 66.31.93.249 (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Largely correct in hindsight[citation needed] —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

COVID-19 misinformation

[edit]

In the "2. Corona-Symposium im Deutschen Bundestag", held by the far-right German AfD in November 2023, he was an invited speaker. The AfD's own Video-docu about this congress, Yeadon's speech was deleted. See German public TV, https://www.ardmediathek.de/, input in "Suche" (=search): "Rache für Corona – wie weit gehen radikale Impfgegner?", Minutes 32-34, especially 34:13: "Die Ausführungen von Herrn Yeadon teilt die Fraktion nicht und hat sich daher entschlossen, den Vortrag nicht über die Medienkanäle der Fraktion zu verbreiten" The German TV journalists from SWR conclude that his opinion speech was even too hard for the far-right AfD. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 13:29, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

So, the goal was exclusively to propagate the AfD's views. Not surprising, given what type of party they are. (For US readers: The German version of the Republicans.)
But why is that relevant for the Yeadon article? Someone invited him and then censored him, so what? --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:09, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am not sure whether the the US Republicans at whole do propagate pseudoscience (at least parts of the Trump government do). The goal of the "2. Corona-Symposium im Deutschen Bundestag" was to propagate pseudoscience, this becomes clear in the SWR docu (one needs to understand german, but written german suffices, they have good subtitles/"Sprache und Barrierefreiheit → Untertitel"). --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 11:30, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I am not sure whether the the US Republicans at whole do propagate pseudoscience Almost all of them are climate change deniers, covidiocy is mainstream among them, and creationism is a Republican majority opinion.
I am still not sure this is relevant enough for the article. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fact checkers

[edit]

Scientist who worked with company would know better then outsiders who claim he is lying ~2026-48797-25 (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia follows what reliable sources say, and not what random people on the internet like you think. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:28, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply