Talk:Michael Stuart Ani
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Bbb23 in topic Revisions undone without cause
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael Stuart Ani article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Revisions undone without cause
[edit]I just added a number of references and all were reverted. I've spent several days researching these links. There was no information about why these references were deleted. Just 'too many issues'. That is not helpful editing advice. Wiki asked for help on this stub page, and now it is all deleted without any comment. Fbcooper (talk) 07:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- The initial lack of justification by the administrator to remove my edits, and the lack of any response after several days by that administrator to my complaint leads me to question Wikipedia. If these 'administrators' as so busy they can't justify removing several days work, and then so busy they can't bother answering basic questions, why do they wonder folks refuse to help with good solid referenceable information? It's been 3 days with no response. Fbcooper (talk) 00:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Bbb23: will you provide an explanation to Fbcooper? WP:REVEXP. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Fbcooper, there wasn't much good about what you did to the article, and I suspect you have a WP:COI. Regardless, why don't you propose changes to the article here, and they can be evaluated by more experienced users? As a relative newbie, your editing skills and knowledge of Wikipedia are not very good.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)