Talk:Mewati language
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Largoplazo in topic Page has irrelevant information
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SOMEbody's paper
[edit]The "Voiced vs. Voiceless" and "Aspirated vs. Unaspirated" sections are obviously inadequately contextualized pieces of somebody's research paper picked up and dropped bodily here. (If the wording weren't enough, the reference to Table II, which doesn't exist here, would prove it.)
Also, WHAT is the point of the previous section on this talk page? Is s/he the author of this Wiki article, or what? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Why redirected Ahirwati and Mewati are different language and different regions?
[edit]Why redirected Ahirwati and Mewati are different language and different regions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.119.104.226 (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Page has irrelevant information
[edit]The region in is India not in Pakistan 103.77.42.198 (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- The article doesn't say that the region is in Pakistan, so what are you arguing with? The only mention it makes of Pakistan is to say how many Mewati speakers live there. Largoplazo (talk) 16:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Rajasthan articles
- Low-importance Rajasthan articles
- Stub-Class Rajasthan articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Rajasthan articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Stub-Class language articles
- Low-importance language articles
- WikiProject Languages articles