Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a255a1ce7f66f4e0

Jump to content

Talk:Messerschmitt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by DPdH in topic Messerschmitt Me 109TL... "Other"?

Disputed

[edit]

I was not aware that 'rare' and 'provisional' were synonyms for 'unsubstantiated' and 'unverified'. The person, who added the alleged aircraft to this article, is likely the same person that added it, and several other dubious marques, to List of military aircraft of Germany by manufacturer. He has been asked, several times, to provide satisfactory evidence of this aircraft and is yet to do so. Oboroten 22:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, the Arthur Sack AS-6 is real enough - see this article - and was built with some Messerschmitt components. As for the AS-7 listed here, I have no idea. ericg 16:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

This page says that the only pulsejet-powered aircraft built by messerschmitt was the selbstofer in 1943. The only pulsjet developed by messerschmitt was built in the seventies. I don't see anything of this pulsjet on the page. If you have some information about this please post it. Mr. Donut

Records

[edit]

The article says the Bf. 108 "would soon be setting all sorts of records." Any word on what sorts? Examples? Sca (talk) 19:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Messerschmitt Me 109TL... "Other"?

[edit]

Why the Messerschmitt Me 109TL is listed under Other aircraft rather than in the table with the rest of the designs? Unless there is a valid reason, I'll move the entry to the table. Regards, DPdH (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply