Talk:Message discipline
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by N8chz in topic Examples?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quick review
[edit]First paragraph, I deleted "Essentially, they should try to manipulate any discussion to mislead voters through "glittering generalities".", because I don't see why not allowing oneself to be be distracted by questions or parasite thought is equivalent to actively deceiving and manipulating. And the tone used seems suspicious to me. And there is no reference.
And, on the whole, I think this article doesn't respect the Neutral point of view policy.
Cheers, Thouny (talk) 04:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- I cut it out of the page altogether. Gender Roamer (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Examples?
[edit]I think the article could benefit from some examples of preferred terminology as a method of message discipline, i.e. "death tax" vs. "estate tax" or "TW" vs. "trans woman". N8chz (talk) 03:20, 27 June 2021 (UTC)