Talk:MessagEase

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Weight of Alternatives

Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not convinced that the Alternatives section is very good. Its only sources are application store links and therefore seems to me to be ascribing undue weight to these applications. Even if they are worth mentioning, a lot of their information is barely relevant. Why list all the available input languages for ThumbKey? How does "Tessera Keyboard [attempt] to recreate a more refined user experience?" This sounds like advertising to me. Kheiristotle (talk) 19:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:MessagEase

Weight of Alternatives