Talk:Meshtastic

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Referenc to unlicensed frequency bands

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is incorect to refer to Amateur Radio bands as unlicenced. Radio amateurs all need a licence. There are unlicenced bands that overlap amateur bands. PhilG3TCU (talk) 19:41, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I assumed the idea behind that leading statement, was that this system uses bands which are related to amateur radio, but not ones which require licensing to use. If you are in agreement with that summary, should we perhaps just remove that link to Amateur Radio, and reword it slightly? It is an ISM band, which allows for license-free usage up to a specific broadcast power. With a license, the broadcast power can be increased within the USA. Faceless Fellow (talk) 03:45, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Meshtastic

Referenc to unlicensed frequency bands