Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2216c3e18cb3a24

Jump to content

Talk:Merced River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment

Good articleMerced River has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2009Good article nomineeListed
May 31, 2026Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Mining

[edit]

According to page IV-11 of Merced County's Year 2000 General Plan (adopted December 4, 1990), Western Stone Products is a sand and gravel extraction and processing operation located off S.R. 59 near the Merced River, about five miles west of Snelling. Page VI-18 states that, "Geologically speaking, sand and gravel deposits are relatively young. Merced River deposits are estimated to be 10 thousand years old."

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed uncited statements, including entire pargaraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 04:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Issues appear to have been resolved. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:40, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I will take a look.
@Z1720: Marking with {{cn}} would be super helpful, thanks! — hike395 (talk) 14:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

User:Z1720: What is your opinion of this article now, as work appears to have been done? Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm not done yet. Some of the sentences marked with cn tags seem to be difficult to find secondary sources for, since they seem to be derived from maps. The information in the article is not inaccurate, just difficult to source. — hike395 (talk) 03:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I will keep this open for you to continue working on! Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Done -- I had to rewrite/expand two sections, but now I'm finished with the {{cn}} that Z1720 marked. — hike395 (talk) 17:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.