Talk:Meitetsu Okoshi Line

A fact from Meitetsu Okoshi Line appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 May 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Meitetsu Okoshi Line was closed because there were too many users?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2025/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meitetsu Okoshi Line.

Wikipedia

Trains: in Japan Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Trains in Japan.

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 1 year ago6 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 12:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Meitetsu Okoshi Line was closed because there were too many users?

Source: Tokuda, Koichi (2001). 名鉄の廃線跡を歩く (in Japanese). JTB. p.80

- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Makoto Nishimoto

Created by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 05:06, 26 April 2025 (UTC).Reply

Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. AGF on the offline source. The only issue is that the article currently has no categories. @AlphaBetaGamma: Would you be willing to add some categories to the article and then I can approve? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply