Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29f12fc6919aea1

Jump to content

Talk:Medical microbiology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BalloonWorm in topic Wiki Education assignment: Composition II Section 2

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 11 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Isaiah&Mark.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Citation?

[edit]

I am not entirely sure what the first citation is actually citing. I fixed it as it was an improper format; however it was a journal abstract and I was not sure of the relationship between the journal and the statement made in the article. A. Z. Colvin Talk 03:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article is a mess!

[edit]

Medical microbiology is a simple concept and has a simple explanation. The content of the article is confused and cannot manage to separate general microbiology from medical microbiology, the latter from Infectology (with clinics) and Epidemiology (with transmission routes)! General Microbiology/Medicine/Infectology/Epidemiology are not Medical microbiology. This needs an entire rewrite. This article is a jumble/heap of poorly referenced research and examples from a wide range of issues bordering with medical microbiology. Articles like this create many problems because students read them, accept them as fact, and then professors to spend hours trying to unteach this rubbish. GenOrl (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Easy to Read/Understand But Lacks Organization and Detail

[edit]

This article could use a more proper and structural format based on the content given. The headings and categories are in no particular order and details are missing. The organizational structure of the topics could appear in an order that reflects the cycle/process of a medical biologist and/or a specific microorganism. Overall, this article is easy to understand and read but could use a different organizational style and be further detailed. Briar Perkely (talk) 01:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

see also section

[edit]

would it make sense to have a see also section with:

  1. List of human microbiota(Human microbiome)
  2. Composition of the human body

? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

As well as quite possibly Category:Blood tests, List of medical tests as these is where the results from clinical microbiology is typically used? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 21:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Claes Lindhardt definitely 👍 Aaron Isaac Ojulu (talk) 17:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Composition II Section 2

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2025 and 9 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BalloonWorm (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by BalloonWorm (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)Reply