Talk:Media transparency

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2021 and 14 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zoe.Pierson050. Peer reviewers: Ndongh10.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted link

I have deleted the link to www.mediatransparancy.com because . . .well aside from the name it has absolutely nothing to do with Media Transparancy. It is an organazition focused on promoting conservative only media. --80.96.133.210 (talk) at 21:06, 31 August 2006

Whoever wrote this definition needs to cite it. There are no synonymous definitions with this one anywhere. --137.165.241.139 (talk) at 00:00, 17 May 2007

Additional Information for the page

Hello! I found some sources that could add some extra insight to your wiki page on Media Transparency. I found that you focused on the negative aspects of Media Transparency but there are a lot of ways to include a positive spin on the article you have produced. The article written by Changsoo Song and Jooho Lee titled “Citizens' Use of Social Media in Government, Perceived Transparency, and Trust in Government”, offers a positive spin on media transparency and can be used to help the article change its tone by adding other perspectives. A quote that could be added to a new section of your article concerning the positives of media transparency could include the quote, “Electronic government, also known as e-government—the use of the Internet and other digital media to deliver government information and services to citizens can be an influential factor in the restoration of trust in government because it has the potential to improve government performance (e.g., productivity gains, improved decision processes) and transparency” (Song, C. Lee, J., 2016, p. 434). This information could expand the audience's understanding of media transparency. More information that could be included from the article cited is, “Social media in government enhance citizens’ perceptions of government transparency by enabling them to access more up-to-date government information through more frequent interactions with government. Thus they come to perceive social media in government as making government information relatively more accessible” ((Song, C. Lee, J., 2016, p. 431). If approved, I would create a subsection of your article that includes this information along with more details in order to create a full understanding of media transparency.

Sources:

Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Citizens’ Use of Social Media in Government, Perceived Transparency, and Trust in Government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798 Zoe.Pierson050 (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello again! I added a definition for information subsidies as it was needed in order to fully understand your introduction. http://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/jeburns/subsidies.html

Burns, J. E. (1998) Information subsidies and agenda building: A study of local radio news. 

The New Jersey Journal of Communication, 6. 1-9. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoe.Pierson050 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)