Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a4570376d9014652

Jump to content

Talk:Mayor of Seattle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Steve98052 in topic Images

Images

[edit]

I've been filling in Commons:Category:Mayors of Seattle. The category now has images for more than a third roughly half of the mayors. Would anyone object to rearranging this so that instead of a bunch of big portraits down the right we put a column in the table & add photos or engravings for each mayor for whom we have one? - Jmabel | Talk 08:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC) updated Jmabel | Talk 20:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seeing no objection after leaving this for a few days, I will do this. - Jmabel | Talk 22:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I just found a photo of the last remaining mayor for which no photograph had been included. The caricature of William D Wood was pretty nice though, so I'll link it here in case someone expands the article to add context to the article:
— Steve98052 (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of mayors of Seattle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

“Acting” mayor used incorrectly

[edit]

We are incorrectly using the word “acting” on this page. Tim Burgess is not the acting mayor, he is the mayor. We could put a small (appointed) note behind his name in the infobox since he wasn’t elected by the citizens, although it’s unnecessary. To be clear, if a mayor was incapacitated (say they became very ill) for an extended period of time, the city council president may be asked to be “acting” mayor. That person wouldn’t actually hold the office, they would just be filling in to keep the city running. In this case there was a vacancy in the office, so a new mayor was appointed, sworn in, and now has the official title. --RickyCourtney (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

It appears that the Council agrees with use of "acting" only for Harrell, not for Burgess. I've made the corrections. Thanks for bringing it up. SounderBruce 13:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
There was a lot of discussion between journalists in Seattle around the term "acting" mayor. Harrell wasn't really "acting" mayor either since there wasn't another mayor he was filling in for. According to the city attorney, Harrell was the mayor (not acting mayor) until he declined to keep the office, at which time he became the "mayor pro tem." But since Harrell was almost certain to decline the office, a lot of journalists just defaulted to calling him the acting mayor for lack of a better qualifier. It doesn't help that the titles aren't specifically spelled out in the city charter. But anyway, I digress. --RickyCourtney (talk) 14:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

RfC on calling results at WikiProject Elections

[edit]

Please participate in an RfC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#RfC Should articles say elections are decided based on preliminary returns?. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 05:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

political party and office

[edit]

Office may be declared nonpartisan, but the person elected into office is not. The table in it's current form is misleading. Oniyorg (talk) 12:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why is Harrell the 54th if he was acting?

[edit]

If Harrell was acting, he shouldn’t have been the 54th mayor… Bbraxtonlee (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Numbering Inconsistencies

[edit]

Hi.

I noticed that Bruce Harrell is counted as both 54th and 57th, which I would assume means that mayors are counted separately for non-consecutive terms. However, many of the earlier mayors (e.g. Henry Yesler) are counted only once, even if they served non-consecutive terms. Not only that, but Harrell's first term was only five days long and was an acting position. Rick the Astley (talk) 18:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply