Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225621d5b57122e

Jump to content

Talk:Max Hunter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by The Squirrel Conspiracy in topic DYK nomination

DYK nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that to convince people to let him record their singing, Ozarker folklorist Max Hunter helped them out with chores, including delivering moonshine? Source: "To get people to cooperate, he would help them with the chores, loading hay, tending chickens, feeding calves. "He even delivered stump water," Mrs. Hunter said cheerfully. Stump water? "White lightning. We're talking about moonshine, the kind that would take the top of your head off.""
    • ALT1:... that Ozarker folklorist Max Hunter refused to bequeath his archive of folk song recordings to an academic institution, where he feared they would get buried, so he gave them to his local library instead? Source:

Created by Sdkb (talk). Self-nominated at 23:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC).Reply

  • Not sure if this fulfills the new enough criteria. The article history states that it was moved over from draft space on July 2, but I don't see any difference between it and the last version () before the move. Perhaps I'm missing something; I'm not familiar with how moving goes, so please explain if so, and I'll continue the review. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Figureskatingfan, the eligibility criteria state that Articles that have been worked on exclusively in a user or user talk subpage or at articles for creation or in the Draft namespace and then moved (or in some cases pasted) to the article mainspace are considered new as of the date they reach the mainspace. I nominated it as soon as it was moved. Thank you in advance for conducting the review! {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:03, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Ok, thanks, your answer is satisfactory to me. I'll continue the review, then. ;)
  • Long enough, at 2203 characters. Within policy, QPQ not needed. Both hooks are fine, although I prefer the first 'cause it's more fun and mentions moonshine. ;) Nice job, good to go. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply