Talk:Max Balegde

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a UK prime minister's comments about gender irked Max Balegde into organising a fundraiser event?
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Moergito

Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk) and Georgeykiwi (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 391 past nominations.

Launchballer 12:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC).

New enough, long enough. Article well-sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant, presentable, with no obvious copyright vios. Hook is short enough and interesting. It is sourced, but the source should be added here. No images in article. QPQ done. I will approve it when you add the source here to the template. Mariamnei (talk) 12:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, which guideline requires that? I tend to only add it when the source is offline/paywalled/otherwise tricky to access.--Launchballer 13:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm looking through the guidelines, and I don't actually see such a requirement, so I may have misremembered. I am therefore approving the DYK. That being said, if you look at the nominations at WP:DYKN, the vast majority have a source cited right after the hook. This can be helpful so the reviewer shouldn't need to go chasing after the source and I would encourage you to do this in the future. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

It is most important that the source is cited within the article, and having reviewers check that it is actually cited there is important too. Sometimes the source is only cited in the DYK nomination template and not in the article, which is a problem. So thanks for checking. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)