Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2626ebe0d39122e

Jump to content

Talk:Maurice Motamed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Monkey dog2088 in topic Untitled

[Untitled

[edit]

I would like to start by quoting the article: "..In Parliament, he has been active in suppressing discrimination against Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians. ..".

Untitled

[edit]

This phrasing in my opinion can be put more clearly and conclusively.


As a matter of fact saying that this member of parliament has been  "active in suppressing discrimination..." 

may easily be understood to have the exactly OPPOSED MEANING of the one (probably...) intended by the writer.

That is to say, that it can be understood to mean that he helped to "cover up discrimination", or something of the sort.


I could have made the correction myself, saying that he "had an active role in 'fighting', or 'abolishing' discrimination against Jews, but since I am myself unsure which is the intended and correct meaning -- I cannot see howI can really correct this sentence myself.

Which can only go to show just how undesirably ambiguous it is.

I hope this suggestion will be perceived as useful, which is its sole purpose.

(Monkey dog2088 (talk) 16:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC))Reply


{{{}}}