Talk:Matthew Segal
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by 193.105.24.61 in topic is this encyclopedic?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Untitled
[edit]What else is needed to prove notability? What can be changed to improve the tone? --Emilywww (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
is this encyclopedic?
[edit]This entire article reads like a promotional material for this man. Somebody should rewrite in a neutral tone, because this man is not a universally loved saint. 193.105.24.61 (talk) 08:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)