Talk:Matthew Cradock/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I took a look through this article. Mostly it's good, though I found the following concerns:

• "Craddock was twice married." should be Cradock here to make it consistent throughout article
• "Interest by London merchants in establishing and managing colonial settlements in North America waned after the 1724 failure of the London Company" Either this is irrelevant due to it being so far into the future or that's supposed to say 1624.

Just these couple small issues: I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh duh. It was 1624 of course. I've also fixed the crad[d]ock spelling. Magic♪piano 13:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)