Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22088f788d934fc

Jump to content

Talk:Matour

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by CorinneSD in topic Amenities, points of interest, etc.

Amenities, points of interest, etc.

[edit]

Bonjour, on vient de faire deux rm sur l'article Matour. Il me semble que la rubrique «amenities» a sa place dans cet article. C'est une information incomplète mais elle permet de décrire le village dans son identité et ses singularités, elle a donc un caractère encyclopédique. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.221.139.221 (talk) 18:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Je ne suis pas d'accord. I don't think you will find many town articles on Wikipedia that have a section called "Amenities". That word belongs to language that we use in English for travel guides, not for encyclopedias. Some town articles have a section called "Sights". That could include such things as museums and churches, but would not include swimming pools and cinemas unless they had some special historical or cultural significance. If you feel you must contribute to the English Wikipedia, you might create an account and discuss your ideas with other editors who work on French community articles, for example here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_French_communes. Eric talk 19:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
If I use sections called Tourism and Points of interest, as in many others articles ( Dompierre-les-Ormes for example), can I expect no remove, and a step by step construction of the article (I can't write a perfect article in one shot). Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.221.139.221 (talk) 20:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Reply
(Moved discussion here from my talk page)...
First, I'm no authority here. A Tourism section would be appropriate if the town is a significant tourism destination. "Points of interest" is probably better than "Sights". Keep in mind that the Dompierre-les-Ormes article might not be the best one to use as a template. Its principal author is a local resident of that area who may not have broad experience with how community articles are structured on en.wp. Eric talk 21:33, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hello. Just read your exchange out of curiosity. Eric is right about the word "Amenities" (which usually includes hotels, motels, bed-and-breakfasts, etc., which, unless they are historically or culturally important, would not normally be included in a Wikipedia article). However, I looked at several town and city articles, and they're not all the same. Compare Chilham, Woolpit, and Newcastle upon Tyne, all in England, and Thessaloniki and Tyre, Lebanon, as well as other city and town articles. Look at the table of contents. IP editor, I'm going to add a Welcome template here [looking for the right place] so that you (a) feel welcome to English Wikipedia, and (b) will get links to helpful pages. If you really want to write articles or add material to existing articles on the English Wikipedia, first read some articles and the WP:MOS, WP:OR, WP:RS, and WP:HEP. Let me know if you need any help proofreading. CorinneSD (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)CorinneSD (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply