Talk:Mathoor Govindan Kutty

A news item involving Mathoor Govindan Kutty was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 7 February 2021.

Wikipedia

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Mathoor Govindan Kutty appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Indian Kathakali artist Mathoor Govindan Kutty specialized in Kathakali Stri Vesham, the portrayal of female characters on stage?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2021/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mathoor Govindan Kutty.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply