Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2321fbcef56addf

Jump to content

Talk:Mathieu group M12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Toploftical in topic Order

The article ought to include the fact that M12 is a simple group.

Also it should cite the paper

E. F. Assmus, Jr., and H. F. Mattson (1966) "Perfect codes and the Mathieu groups", Archiv der Mathematik vol. XVII, pp. 121-135.

Hmattson (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Order

[edit]

The order is written

   26 · 33 · 5 · 11 = 95040 = 12×11×10×9×8

This seems unnatural. If written for natural-language clarity, it might be:

   95040 = 12×11×10×9×8 = 26 · 33 · 5 · 11

If written to show ‘how derived’, it should be:

   12×11×10×9×8 = 26 · 33 · 5 · 11 = 95040

This seems the best fit with (some) other groups.


Also, the line

≈ 1×105

seems weird: do we really need to be told that 95040 is approximately a hundred grand? Really?

Of course, if there are long-established conventions for the writing of the order of a group, then this comment (except this sentence) might be wrong. JDAWiseman (talk) 16:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The line : ≈ 1×105 is just for consistency with all the other sporadic group which, of course, are all much bigger. It seems best to keep them all the same format for easy comparison. BTW, it took me 137 milliseconds to figure our that 95040 is about 1×105--Toploftical (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply