Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a222a72b19c95b65

Jump to content

Talk:Matching polytope

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 81.221.145.119

The proof https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matching_polytope#Proof_using_the_definition_of_extreme_points does not appear to be correct. Consider a path of 4 vertices with given by in that order along the path. Clearly this is a feasible solution but it is not possible to subtract an from the very last edge without violating . 81.221.145.119 (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Henrik LaxhuberReply

You are right, the proof is incomplete. I removed it until I (or someone else) finds a way to fix it. --Erel Segal (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
A fix could be to only modify those vertices reachable from without going through an edge of integral weight. It should be possible to show that none of these edges are adjacent to an edge of weight () 1 due to . The idea carries over also to the bipartite vertex cover polytope, where it should be possible to show that none of the fractional vertices are adjacent to a vertex of zero weight. --81.221.145.119 (talk) 08:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Henrik LaxhuberReply