Talk:Master of G

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations:
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Watches (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.WatchesWikipedia:WikiProject WatchesTemplate:WikiProject WatchesWatches

The content of Casio G-Shock Frogman was merged into Master of G on 16 September 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Proposed merge of Casio G-Shock Frogman into Master of G

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

It can fit into the History and the Characteristics sections pretty well. A lot of info is duplicated. The article itself doesn't meet notability guidelines. Aaron Liu (talk) 23:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply