Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a4590e078c9351a8

Jump to content

Talk:Massylii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by M.Bitton in topic Not Berber.

Not Berber.

[edit]

@M.Bitton: Numidian language is also listed with "Old Libyan" name and listed under Libyco-Berber language branch, not Berber. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 10:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Sidoroff-B: You're confusing the tribe with the language (the same goes for the Masaesyli). Did you mean to link to Numidians? M.Bitton (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@M.Bitton: Berber people are a modern people. How could a tribal federation that existed more than 2000 years ago belong to them? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Your question is based on a false premise. M.Bitton (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@M.Bitton: Please explain. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 22:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Berber people are a modern people is the false premise. M.Bitton (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
When do all today's Berber languages have a common ancestor? Does the Massylii language fall inside today's divergence? When was the term "Berber" first used? Why are most of Northern and Eastern (at least) Berber male lineages only 2200 years old? https://yfull.com/tree/E-PF2546/ --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 12:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
They are described as Berbers because they were Numidians and the Numidians were Berbers (this is easily sourced). I have no issue with linking to Numidians instead of Berbers. M.Bitton (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

My old comment was stricken-through because you decided to change the article 8 month after you abandoned the discussion and only after having needlessly tagged the Numidian article. I have added some reliable sources to address your concerns. M.Bitton (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply