Talk:Martinogale
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by LaraPoasting in topic Translation
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
Translation
[edit]@LaraPoasting: This appears to be a direct translation of the Spanish-language article. Proper attribution of that work needs to be included. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- it is actually the other way around, i did both. LaraPoasting (talk) 11:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah. I see that now. You left a "y" in in place of an "and" which made me think it was translated from there. Please fix it. Also, there are some capitalization and boldings that should be undone to conform to our MOS. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Spanglish sometimes gets my ass i fear, I hope it's all better now. LaraPoasting (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed! I've made some further improvements. Note that there's also Martinogale nambiana Cope, 1874 listed on GBIF and PaleoDB (you can find those in the taxonbar) and you may want to expand the article to include that species. I note here the issue indicated by GBIF that this species was described before the genus was. Might be worth a mention if not a full inclusion in the way the other species are included. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was under the impression it was a junior synonym of a different species, I suppose I was mistaken, working on it boss ! LaraPoasting (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed! I've made some further improvements. Note that there's also Martinogale nambiana Cope, 1874 listed on GBIF and PaleoDB (you can find those in the taxonbar) and you may want to expand the article to include that species. I note here the issue indicated by GBIF that this species was described before the genus was. Might be worth a mention if not a full inclusion in the way the other species are included. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Spanglish sometimes gets my ass i fear, I hope it's all better now. LaraPoasting (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah. I see that now. You left a "y" in in place of an "and" which made me think it was translated from there. Please fix it. Also, there are some capitalization and boldings that should be undone to conform to our MOS. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)