Talk:Martin Barry

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

	This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Future disambiguation

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please note that a Martin Barry (director) is listed at Genie Award for Best Animated Short and 11th Genie Awards. If that article gets created, a disambiguation page may be needed. I think this Martin Berry is the more notable one, and so a hatlink at the top here should be enough. Carcharoth (talk) 22:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The date of death of 1885 is wrong - it should be 1855. There was an obituary published in the same year, in Proc Roy Soc 1854-1855 vol 7 pp 577-582. (Information from http://royalsociety.org/). C0pernicus (talk) 14:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the DNB article also has 1855, I suspect a simple typo introduced the error. DuncanHill (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oops! Thanks for spotting that, COpernicus. Carcharoth (talk) 18:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply