Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a44983483ce8cf56

Jump to content

Talk:Marie Wreschner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 hours ago by Yue in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]

  • ... that Marie Wreschner patented a method for treating cancer using radioactive materials in 1925?
  • Source: "in 1925...patented a treatment for cancer...The special feature of their invention was the adsorption of electron-emitting uranyl compounds in a suspension of ferric hydroxide. This approach of encapsulation of drugs in attachments or cages of benign molecules has become common in modern medical applications, and the patent of Wreschner and Loeb was perhaps nearly 100 years ahead of its time." (pp. 45-47)
    • ALT1: ... that Marie Wreschner received a patent in 1930 for a radioactive liquid that killed tumors in animals? Source: "Patent published by Marie Wreschner and Laurence Loeb in 1930 describing a new treatment for cancer...This research led on to an investigation, which she carried out in collaboration with Dr. Farmer Loeb, using suspensions of iron oxide particles with adsorbed Uranium for the treatment of cancer. By careful and untiring work Dr. Wreschner succeeded in producing suspensions of this kind which in animal experiments were markedly successful in destroying malignant tumours, though perfectly harmless in other respects. Although she tried with great energy and patience to induce medical circles to test this method on a larger scale on man this has not so far been done..." (pp. 45; 49)
    • ALT2: ... that Marie Wreschner was unable to find asylum in Britain before the Holocaust because she was aged 51? Source: ...asking if they [British charities] could find assistance [asylum]. She said on 28 February 1939, “The various institutions and laboratories are now getting so full that I think they prefer to give what facilities they can to younger people who have a chance of getting off their hands within a limited period.” In a letter on 9 March 1939, to the Emergency Sub-Committee for Refugees, British Federation of University Women, Tess Simpson also stated, “It seems to me that the chief difficulty in Dr. Wreschner’s case is her age.” By 1939, Wreschner was aged 51 and... her age was still counting strongly against her." (p. 50)
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hanna–Honeycomb House
Created by RabidTuberculosis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 25 past nominations.

RabidTuberculosis (talk) 21:33, 29 September 2026 (UTC).Reply

  • I will review this today. Yue🌙 (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @RabidTuberculosis: I see the cited passages in the article, but they do not explicitly mention Britain or the Holocaust. Some hook promoters are quite picky about this, but I also think it might be confusing for some readers who do not have knowledge of the International Federation of University Women or (less likely) the Holocaust. Yue🌙 (talk) 20:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @Yue: Thanks for reviewing! The book is about scientists killed during the Holocaust. I provided quotes most relevant to the hooks, although surrounding passages explicitly mention Nazi racial laws, her attempts to find a position at Oxford, correspondence with British organizations, and ultimate death to avoid deportation. The page numbers I cited are a good guide, please let me know if you have trouble finding anything in particular! RabidTuberculosis (talk) 21:22, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @RabidTuberculosis: I think a strict interpretation of DYK rules would conclude that ALT2 would be fine if it said "World War II" instead of "the Holocaust", but common sense tells me that it doesn't matter because 1939 is, in fact, before the Holocaust. However, neither the source provided nor the article explicitly mentions the Holocaust (aside from the category), so technically ALT2 isn't verified in the article even if the conclusion is obvious to most readers. However, again I personally wouldn't care about that technicality. I will approve without question ALT0 and ALT1, and leave ALT2 to the judgement of the promoter. Yue🌙 (talk) 22:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Spot-checked citations 12, 13, 14, 17, and 18. Remedied some minor issues. Yue🌙 (talk) 22:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply