Talk:Maria Einsmann/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by EF5 in topic GA review
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Kusma (talk · contribs) 23:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: EF5 (talk · contribs) 14:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this in the next few days as part of GARC. :) EF5 14:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC) Okay, my comments:
- File:Einsmann.jpg Needs alt text for blind or visually impaired readers.
- Added to both images.
- "for example in France, the Netherlands, Estonia and the US" should probably should be changed to "for example in France, the Netherlands, Estonia and the United States" (including the WikiLinks).
- MOS:OVERLINK recommends not to link countries.
- Link Factory worker in lead.
- Done.
- "aged almost 99" so... 98? It'd be better to say "aged 98" than to leave the reader guessing.
- Done.
- I suggest changing "The marriage officially ended in divorce in 1923" to "The marriage ended with the pair divorcing in 1923", alhough this isn't a requirement for anything.
- The issue here is that Einsmann did not take part in the divorce proceedings; her husband divorced her after years of no contact.
- Suggest rewording "In Mainz, the Mainz-Altstadt district decided in 2014 to commemorate" to "In 2014, the Mainz-Altstadt district of Mainz decided to commemorate" as it rolls off the tongue better. Again, not a requirement.
- Done.
That's all I've got right now, pinging @Kusma: for the fixes, good job! I'll also add that the SFNs are perfect, great job on that! EF5 20:06, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you EF5 for reviewing! Let me know if there is anything else. —Kusma (talk) 23:15, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- @EF5, is this everything or do you have further comments that I should address? —Kusma (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Kusma, apologies, I appear to have forgotten about the review. Everything looks good! — EF5 17:16, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- @EF5, is this everything or do you have further comments that I should address? —Kusma (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.