Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a243f594db894af4

Jump to content

Talk:Marghera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 82.131.129.192 in topic The tower of Babylon wears Prada?

The tower of Babylon wears Prada?

[edit]

Possible food for the trivia section: just heard on the radio that some international top fashion guru wants to design and build a 260 meter tall skyscraper in Porto Marghera, to top off his carreer before retirement. (Can't find any related info on the net, however.) Me thinks this will not sit well with venexians, since there is an ancient law that says nothing can be taller than the San Marco belltower in the whole Serenissima. Furthermore, airline pilots of the world would be moste grateful for such a skyscraper, considering how close Marco Polo Tessera airport lies to that site. 82.131.129.192 (talk) 11:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK, just found the info from La Stampa. It is the pet plan of int'l fashion caesar Pierre Cardin, who was born in Sant’ Andrea di Barbarana, just 16km from Venice and left for France with family at the age of two. The 244m tall "Palais Lumiere" of 69 stairs and 21 elevators would stand in the Porto Marghera industrial site, taking 4 years and 1,5bn euros to build. Luca Zaia, president of Regione Veneto supports this plan as the Serenissima's Eiffel-tower, since it would create 4500 jobs, including a hotel. Luca and Pierre will go onsite to promote the plan in Venezia very soon. (I suggest they ride the armoured gondola made for the Pope's visit last year considering the likely public outrage...) 82.131.129.192 (talk) 11:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply