Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a283353049a9365e

Jump to content

Talk:Margaret of Beverley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 62.4.56.233 in topic Women warriors

Women warriors

[edit]

The writers of this page go to great lengths to pretend that women warriors were a normal, but suppressed thing in history, and to deny or cast doubt on the historical claims that, for example, Margaret wore a pot as a helmet, carried water and the rest, solely on that basis. All historical record and literature contradict that modern elitest assumption. Women were not warriors as a rule, and became such only under desperate circumstances, because they simply did not have the size, strength, or physical build of men in physical combat. It is obviously to Margaret’s great credit that she did what she did, and the pretense that women warriors were a normal thing belittles her greatness in rising up to something she wasn’t fit for by her ontological status. 62.4.56.233 (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply