Talk:Manchester Coalfield
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Geopersona in topic Coal mine or seam?
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coal mine or seam?
[edit]Given the explanation in the text which precedes it, does the title of the first column want to be altered to just 'mine' or, less confusingly, 'seam' which is the standard term for a thickness of coal in a rock sequence, rather than the local term? cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am no expert, just interested, so at your suggestion I will change the title to seam. Thanks for reading.--J3Mrs (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm no expert either but it seems clearer this way. Good to see others taking an interest in the coalfields. I've been surprised how poor the coverage on Wikipedia has been on the British coalfields hitherto, though certain mines have been well documented. cheers Geopersona (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Greater Manchester articles
- Mid-importance Greater Manchester articles
- Start-Class Mining articles
- Mid-importance Mining articles
- WikiProject Mining articles
- Start-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- Start-Class energy articles
- Unknown-importance energy articles