Talk:Mancation
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by JasonAQuest in topic This is idiotic.
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10/5/2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
This is idiotic.
[edit]Seriously. I would PROD it, but... I'm sure it will survive. ViniTheHat (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a page for an attempted neologism that never actually caught on, for a nebulous and un-notable "thing" that has existed – without needing a name or wankish article about it – for as long as leisure travel. Trend-baiting articles by publications desperate to fill space do not constitute WP:RS. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- It was previously nominated for deletion, and the arguments for keeping it boiled down to "I hate this, but someone created this thing in good faith, and it appears to have sources, so we should keep it to encourage her to keep editing." And she didn't. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 13:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)