Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a29dd802fd11a23e

Jump to content

Talk:Magnetic Reynolds number

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merger proposal

Distinct from the Reynolds number?

[edit]

Is there a reason why this redirects to Reynolds number? The similarity in the name comes about becuase the parameters take a similar (but physically distinct) form and appear in similar places in non-dimensional versions of similarly structured (but physically distinct) equations. However, one affects the form of a fluid flow, and the other affects the behaviour of the magntic field in MHD problems. There's also no mention of "Magnetic Reynolds Number" on the "Reynolds number" page. I think there should be a separate article here. Rjw62 13:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

[edit]

The Magnetic Reynolds number is the Lundquist number when the typical velocity scale of the system is the Alven velocity.— AquaDTRS (talk) 06:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

The articles should not be combined. The Lundquist number is the ratio of the resistive diffusion time to the Alfvén crossing time, whereas the magnetic Reynolds number is the ratio of the inductive time to the resistive diffusion time. The two equations look similar, but only if one substitutes the Alfven velocity for the fluid velocity. The Alfvén velocity is the velocity of a plasma wave, and the fluid velocity is the velocity of a fluid. They're not the same. The ratio of the two quantities is

Note here I've included the necessary factor of which many publications omit since they use normalized quantities. X4096 (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Closing, given no support. Klbrain (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply